Do Moons of Gas Giants Affect the Habitable Zone?
A while back one of my plusketeers (Google+ follower) asked this question:
Do the parameters for the habitable zone change if we consider moons of gas giants?
I’ve been wondering about this (especially with all of the Kepler news the past couple of months), but can’t figure out how to search the all-knowing Google for an answer.
(related, the Drake Equation doesn’t seem to take habitable moons into account – should it?)
This is actually a very interesting question, especially with the fact that I’m working VERY hard to specialize in Exoplanetary Science.
If you aren’t familiar with the Drake Equation, or how it may actually apply to exomoons, continue reading to learn more about the famous equation.
Additionally, I’ll discuss what conditions could make a habitable moon like “Pandora” as depicted in the blockbuster movie, Avatar, or the forest Moon of Endor as seen in Return of the Jedi
For starters, what exactly is the “Drake Equation”? SETI founder Frank Drake is credited with the equation, hence the name.
The equation is as follows (Courtesy of SETI):
N = R* • fp • ne • fl • fi • fc • L
By adjusting one (or more) parameters in the equation, you can come up with estimates for habitable worlds (with intelligent life) in our Galaxy. Of course, new discoveries of exoplanets in habitable zones provide data that can be used in the Drake Equation (keep in mind in that exoplanets weren’t discovered until the 1990′s).
So how does all this fit in with the habitable zone?
Shown in the image to the left is an infographic showing where the habitable zone would be in our Solar System, given different classes of stars.
The “habitable zone” is merely a region where, given proper atmospheric conditions, liquid water could exist in a stable form on the surface of a body.
As you can see, a smaller, dimmer star would produce a habitable zone closer to the central star, and a larger, brighter star would push this habitable zone further out.
So, for the most part, the habitable zone is determined by the luminosity of the central star.
But wait, there’s more!
Just because a world isn’t in the habitable zone doesn’t necessarily mean it can’t have liquid water. Look at moons such as Europa or Enceladus. While the first impression of these icy worlds is that of a giant ball of ice, it is theorized that tidal flexing may heat the interiors of these worlds and provide an environment where liquid water may exist.
Keep in mind that the distance between a world and its host star can only provide an educated guess as to whether or not liquid water can exist on its surface. There are other factors such as the composition of the world itself (both surface and atmospheric), and that the mechanism for providing planets with water still isn’t completely understood.
So, to sum everything up, if astronomers detect a gas giant planet outside the habitable zone of its parent star, there’s still a chance it may harbor habitable moons – well, at least habitable for basic life. If a Jupiter-class planet is detected in the habitable zone of its parent star, it is well within the realm of possibilities for an Earth-like habitable moon to exist in orbit around said planet.
Of course, said detections are still a few years away – currently researchers can detect exoplanets a bit smaller than Mars, and are working on ways to detect moons orbiting around large exoplanets. As for updating Drake’s famous equation – I think we can simply replace planet with “world” and continue our search for life elsewhere in our Galaxy.